PR ResourcesReformed Encyclopaedia
SearchResourcesScriptureExploreAskLiveChurchesAboutContact
  1. Home
  2. Search

Type

Scripture

Publisher

Source

Year Range

–
PR Resources

A not-for-profit initiative making the theological riches of the Reformed faith freely available to the church worldwide.

Newsletter

Weekly digest of newly added resources

Navigate

SearchResourcesExploreAsk a QuestionAuthorsScripture Index

Community

Find a ChurchAboutContactCopyright NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceFeature Requests(coming soon)RSS FeedSupport This Project

Related Sites

RFPAPRCACPRCSermonAudio

© 2026 PR Resources. A not-for-profit project. All content belongs to its respective authors and publishers.

Support us

Showing 10 results for “gottschalk”

CPRC BooksBookExact

Gottschalk: Servant of God

Connie Meyer
Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Gottschalk Servant of God

Taylor Vink·2016-02-01

This was contrary to Gottschalk’s belief and teachings of double predestination. This caused great controversy in the church and state, which were closely knit together in the 800s. The life of Gottschalk shows that God, in his purpose at times in history, uses the voice of a single man to further t

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Gottschalk – Lone Voice in the Night (4)

Connie Meyer·2011-01-01

To them, this was a “new heresy.” Gottschalk

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Gottschalk – Lone Voice in the Night (6)

Connie Meyer·2011-03-01

The archbishop, who led the Synod in its decisions, gripped his staff until his knuckles were white. Rabanus Maurus had arguments of his own. In the end, this Synod of 848 condemned the monk and priest named Gottschalk. What he taught was heresy. The church said so. The archbishop said so. Synod was

Standard BearerJournal ArticleRelated

God’s Servant: Gottschalk of Orbais (Double Predestinarian and Martyr)

Ronald Hanko·2015-11-01

The Man Gottschalk's name means "Servant of God," and as a servant of God's truth he lived and died. To suffer as he did for the doctrine of sovereign double predestination, he had not only in name but also in heart to be God's servant. Born around 803,1 Gottschalk anticipated Calvin's teaching by

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Gottschalk – Lone Voice in the Night (5)

Connie Meyer·2011-02-01

Making Gottschalk’s teachings sound even worse would help fight this dangerous heresy, Rabanus reasoned. The battle lines were drawn. Predestination became the topic of many conversations. Bishop Noting received the letter from Rabanus and published it. Scholars discussed it. Gottschalk continued to

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Gottschalk – Lone Voice in the Night (2)

Connie Meyer·2010-10-01

Rabanus Maurus, the abbot of the monastery, was by the altar. Gottschalk had learned much under Rabanus and the other teachers at Fulda. This was one of the best places in the whole empire to receive an education. But still, Gottschalk did not want to be a monk. He could inherit land, for his own fa

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Gottschalk – Lone Voice in the Night (8)

Connie Meyer·2011-05-01

They wrote letters to Hincmar, protesting how cruel he had been to the monk. They continued to discuss what Gottschalk believed and taught. While Gottschalk was in prison, three more synods were held to consider the doctrines that he had discovered in the Scriptures and in the writings of Augustine.

Standard BearerJournal ArticleRelated

The Doctrine of Sin, The Third Period, 730-1517 A.D. (1): Gottschalk

Herman Veldman·1968-12-01

Gottschak, the son of count Berno (or Bern), was sent in his childhood by his parents to the famous Hessian convent of Fulda as a pious offering. When he had attained mature age, he denied the validity of his involuntary tonsure, wished to leave the convent, and brought his case before a Synod of Ma

Standard BearerJournal ArticleRelated

Gottschalk-Semi-Pelagianism

Herman Hoeksema·1929-01-01

For a time Gottschalk traveled, visiting various places and ecclesiastical celebrities both in the East and in the West. He spoke ardently of the truth he loved. But, strange though it may seem, his views found little favor. They were considered dangerous, considering that they minimized the respons