Showing 10 results for “n.t. wright”
November 2009 127 ers, so that God can declare sin- ners “in the right” (as Wright puts it). Somehow or other, Christ was “faithful” to God’s plan for Israel in a way that makes it possible for God to justify (in the NPP sense) others. But about one thing Wright is clear, emphatic, and repetitive:
130 Vol. 41, No. 2 Protestant Reformed Theological Journal unregenerated reason, but they did make this truth, possessed of all men, a preparatory truth, pav- ing the way for the acceptance of biblical truth. In this way the antithesis is seriously breached. The antithesis is not only be- tween goo
solo performer, but one who la- bored in fundamental concert with the other apostles. He ar- gues that it is incorrect to think of Paul "as a solitary beacon that shines its light on deserted shores." Instead, "It is better to compare Paul to a star that does not shine all by itself. He may be a c
November 2012 165 Book Reviews book is too charitable toward the theologians of the NPP. You will search in vain for the word “heresy” or “heretic” in this book. The closest Venema comes is this statement: “An unqualified doc- trine of a final justification which is suspended upon the works of beli
John Piper recently has valiantly attempted to defend justification by faith alone against Wright's and the new perspective on Paul's denial of this cardinal doctrine. But as a Baptist, John Piper does not, indeed cannot, grasp that justification in N.T. Wright as its source in Wright's doctrin
Introduction Calvin College (Grand Rapids, MI) hosted its thirtieth "January Series" in January 2017. Appearing, he informed his audience, for the fifth time, N.T. Wright, former Bishop of Durham in England, and current research professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at the University of
Protestant Reformed Theological Journal Vol. 49, No. 2 150 doctrine with might and main. The contemporary “challenger” to the truth of faith alone upon whose theology Schreiner con- centrates is N. T. Wright. The reader of this review who is not acquainted with the contemporary controversy over jus