PR ResourcesReformed Encyclopaedia
SearchResourcesScriptureExploreAskLiveChurchesAboutContact
  1. Home
  2. Search

Type

Scripture

Publisher

Source

Year Range

–
PR Resources

A not-for-profit initiative making the theological riches of the Reformed faith freely available to the church worldwide.

Newsletter

Weekly digest of newly added resources

Navigate

SearchResourcesExploreAsk a QuestionAuthorsScripture Index

Community

Find a ChurchAboutContactCopyright NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceFeature Requests(coming soon)RSS FeedSupport This Project

Related Sites

RFPAPRCACPRCSermonAudio

© 2026 PR Resources. A not-for-profit project. All content belongs to its respective authors and publishers.

Support us

Showing 10 results for “1924 Common Grace Controversy”

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Through Strife to Victory: Chapter 9 – What Did the 1924 Synod Decide?

Cornelius Hanko·1998-10-01

The question remains: What did the Synod of 1924 actually decide in regard to the issue of common grace?

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

A Protestant Reformed World and Life View (3)

Herman Hanko·1959-01-01

Common Grace! What memories that term brings to the minds of those who are members of our Protestant Reformed Churches. For it was in opposition of this theory developed by the Christian Reformed Church culminating in the Synod of 1924 that is the main historical reason for the establishment of our

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

George M. Ophoff (13)

Herman Hanko·1977-10-01

I shall use my talents to help expose, in the light of Gods Word, the dangers and fallacies of common grace. The Synod of 1924 declared itself for common grace. Yet the Synod evaded the real issues. The Synod failed to furnish proof. The existence of common grace has never been proven. The objection

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

I Remember Herman Hoeksema: Personal Remembrances of a Great Man (2)

David Engelsma·2008-10-01

Accompanying the ever more enthusiastic embrace of common grace was the corresponding rejection of particular grace. The denial of sovereign, particular grace implicit in the “well-meant offer” of the first point of common grace of 1924 worked itself out in the explicit denial of limited atonement b

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Essay Report

Virginia Griffioen·1955-07-01

Common Grace, Grace

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

George M Ophoff (8)

Herman Hanko·1976-04-01

To understand this incident, you must be aware of the fact that already during the years in which George was in college the common grace controversy was in the air. We cannot go into the history of this controversy in these articles, although this is, in itself, interesting enough. There were especi

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

Lessons From Our Beginning: What 1924 Has to Teach Us Today Concerning our Calling as “Spiritual Youth in a Carnal World”

Michael DeVries·1993-06-01

Strikingly, the CRC Synod of 1924 had warned, in the third part of the decision regarding common grace, against all one-sided emphasis on the misuse of the doctrine of Common Grace. 1) This warning that the result would be worldliness was indeed prophetic. 2)  But the spirit of worldliness against w

Protestant Reformed Theological JournalJournal ArticleRelated

PRTJ Vol. 25, No. 2 (April 1992)

1992-04-01

Common Grace and the discussions surrounding them have become outdated. Scarcely anyone knows anymore what the three points are all about and what specifically they teach. They are, seemingly, a part of ancient history which interests only a few historians. They themselves are really no longer relev

Beacon LightsJournal ArticleRelated

The Foundation of the Protestant Reformed Church

Karen Hanko·1987-02-01

Common Grace, Grace, Protestant Reformed Churches

Protestant Reformed Theological JournalJournal ArticleExact

Prof. H.C. Hoeksema _

Unknown·1981-11-01