Response to “Ists and Isms”

Dear Editor: I would like to make a few comments about the recent article in the Beacon Lights entitled “Ists and Isms.”  I wish to make a few comments on the definition of sect and the relationship of provincial tendencies to a sect. First of all, the author does mention that there are many definitions of the word sect.  However, he prefers the definition of “a one-man affair”; that in all of its features it is a one-man affair.  The understanding that I get from the term sect, substantiated...