Jonah’s fish
Ronald Hanko defends the historical reality and miraculous nature of Jonah's account against liberal scholarship and secular skepticism, arguing for a straightforward biblical interpretation. The article grounds the Jonah narrative in God's sovereignty and grace while demonstrating its typological significance for understanding Christ's redemptive work.
Jonah 1:17 The story of Jonah's being swallowed by a "great fish" is often ridiculed by unbelievers. It even figured in the famous Scopes trial in 1925 in an exchange between Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan. Darrow, counsel for the defense of John Scopes who was accused of teaching human evolution contrary to Tennessee law, asked Bryan: "But when you read that Jonah swallowed the whale -- or that the whale swallowed Jonah…how do you literally interpret that?" To which question Bryan,...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer