Reply to My Classical Censure (2)
Classis East of the Prot. Ref. Churches, Convened in Hudsonville, April 1953. Thirdly, I claim that the Rev. Kok and the consistory did not speak the truth, and therefore, lied, when in their answer to the classis, read on April 8th last, they presented the church political conception of Mr. Kortering as implying that the suspension of a pastor must not be initiated with the consistory, but rather with classis and synod. In an answer of the consistory dated Feb. 3, 1953, which was a reply to a...
Read Full Article on Standard Bearer
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer