More on Ken Ham Debate
Philip Rainey responds to a debate about Ken Ham and evolutionary science, arguing that atheistic empiricism is self-contradictory both logically and biblically. He demonstrates that empiricism's fundamental axiom—that truth about the physical world derives from sense experience—cannot itself be verified through sense experience, making it logically incoherent.
I appreciate the discussion between Brendan Looyenga and Rev. Spronk regarding our critique of evolutionary science (SB, July 2014). Dr. Looyenga argues: "the problem with atheistic science is not its failure at logic, but rather its failure to comport with the truths of Scripture." I suggest the problem with atheistic science is both its failure at logic and its failure to comport with Scripture. Atheistic science, in common with empirical science as a whole, has for its fundamental premise...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org