What the Layman Should Know About Textual Criticism (7): Bible Versions
Douglas Kuiper addresses how textual criticism affects Bible version selection, arguing that the King James Version's textual basis represents a significant strength often overlooked by modern translations. The article defends the reliability of passages like John 7:53-8:11 against critical dismissals and challenges common assumptions in contemporary textual criticism that undermine believers' confidence in Scripture.
Six previous articles briefly introduced us to the history, principles, and practice of textual criticism. My purpose was to respond to comments in some Bible versions (ESV and NIV, for example) that say that certain manuscripts omit a certain passage. As case studies, we looked at Mark 16:9-20 and John 7:53-8:11. The comments, frankly, are unhelpful. First, they state a fact that the average Bible reader does not have the background, skill, or knowledge to evaluate. Second, they state...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer