The Error of Eternal Functional Subordination: An Evangelical Debate
McGeown examines the Eternal Functional Subordination (EFS) debate within American Evangelicalism, explaining the theological positions of proponents like Wayne Grudem and critics like Carl Trueman regarding whether the Son is eternally subordinate to the Father in function while remaining ontologically equal. This article provides a clear analysis of a significant contemporary controversy about the nature and relationships within the Godhead, offering Reformed perspective on defending orthodox Trinitarian doctrine against problematic formulations.
A Theological Debate There is presently raging within American Evangelicalism a debate on the relationship among the three persons of the Trinity. This debate is called the "Eternal Functional Subordination" (or EFS) controversy. On one side of this debate are Wayne Grudem (Phoenix Seminary) and Bruce Ware (Southern Baptist Theological Seminary), while on the other side are Carl Trueman (Westminster Theological Seminary) and Liam Goligher (senior minister of Tenth Presbyterian Church in...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer