The other side of the coin: The Supreme Court considers freedom of conscience in the light of Obergefell (1)
This journal article examines the Supreme Court's Masterpiece Cakeshop case, which raises critical questions about the intersection of religious liberty and LGBTQ+ rights in contemporary American law. Vanengen analyzes the tension between a baker's religious conscience objection and anti-discrimination protections, offering a Reformed perspective on how Christian convictions should be defended in the public square.
We have previously looked at the United States Supreme Court's decision in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges,1 in which the Court found that the rights embodied in the U.S. Constitution included a right for homosexuals to marry ("The Supreme Court Finds a Right to Homosexual Marriage [1-3]," Dec. 15, 2015; Feb. 1, 2016; May 15, 2016). As was noted at that time, when one such right is recognized, it raises the question of the limits of that right in relation to other recognized rights. The...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer