Chapter Five: Premillennialism (12) Critique of the Premillennial Explanation of Daniel 9 (1)
David Engelsma critiques the premillennial interpretation of Daniel 9:24-27, particularly the doctrine of a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks and the future rapture. This scholarly article examines how premillennialism's handling of this prophecy differs from Reformed amillennial understanding and evaluates the coherence of their eschatological framework.
Previous article in this series: December 15, 2016, p. 129. Introduction Of at least equal importance for the premillennial understanding of the last things with Revelation 20 is the prophecy of the seventy weeks of Daniel 9. Taking the seventy weeks as seventy weeks of years, that is, a definite period of 490 years, premillennialism separates the seventieth week from the preceding sixty-nine weeks. The first sixty-nine weeks were the time between the command to rebuild Jerusalem and the...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer