Banned by the Evangelical Times!
Rev. Angus Stewart documents the British Reformed Fellowship's conflict with the Evangelical Times over a refused advertisement, arguing that the BRF's rejection of the well-meant offer doctrine is consistent with historical Reformed theology, particularly the Formula Consensus Helvetica and patristic sources. This article serves as both a defense of Reformed unconditional election against modern evangelical assumptions and an account of institutional resistance to classical Reformed soteriology.
Rev. Angus Stewart Early in 2016, the British Reformed Fellowship (BRF) placed paid ads in several British evangelical newspapers for both the 2016 BRF Conference and the British Reformed Journal (BRJ). The Evangelical Times (ET) accepted our money and carried the ad for the conference, but later refused the ad for the BRJ, after asking for a recent copy of it and The Five Points of Calvinism, a BRF book. Below is a copy of the e-mail sent by Rev. Angus Stewart (BRF Chairman) to Roger Fay...