Assurance and good works (3)
Cammenga defends the Reformed doctrine of limited atonement and unconditional election against Arminian objections, arguing that these doctrines actually provide believers with assurance of salvation rather than undermining it. The article contends that faith in Christ's particular atonement for the elect grounds the Christian's confidence in personal salvation and demonstrates why Arminianism fails to provide genuine assurance.
Previous article in this series: January 15, 2021, p. 182. Stooping to our weakness "Calvinist believers who struggle with their assurance can never know with certainty that they are one of the elect." So writes Jerry L. Walls in Why I Am Not a Calvinist.1 The charge is as old as Arminianism. It was an objection voiced by the Arminians (Remonstrants) prior to the Synod of Dordt. In reality, the opposite is true. It is the teaching of Arminianism that strips believers of comfort. This heresy...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer