A Belated but Necessary Reply

[Editor's Note: This reply of the Rev. Heys is in response to comment by Mr. Jacobson in the March 15 issue, p. 273]. [Editor's Note: This reply of the Rev. Heys is in response to comment by Mr. Jacobson in the March 15 issue, p. 273]. To reject the interpretation of a particular passage of Holy Writ, one that appeared in the Standard Bearer, and in the first articles of a series on the book of Esther is one thing. It is quite a different thing when the accuser charges the one who wrote these...