An Attempted Reformed Defense of Billy Graham (2)
As I promised, I now return to what I characterized as "philosophy" in Dr. Jerome De Jong's explanation of total depravity. I have already shown that De Jong's explanation is not Billy Graham's. As I promised, I now return to what I characterized as "philosophy" in Dr. Jerome De Jong's explanation of total depravity. I have already shown that De Jong's explanation is not Billy Graham's. But Dr. De Jong's presentation of total depravity is itself a denial of that doctrine. For consider that...
Read Full Article on Standard Bearer
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer