More on Esther and Mordecai
Holt responds to previous articles debating the ethics of Esther and Mordecai's conduct in the biblical narrative, arguing that their actions should be understood within the context of their powerless position as Jews under Persian tyranny rather than as deliberate deception. He contends that Esther's concealment of her Jewish identity was wise discretion born of necessity rather than sinful lying, and that both characters deserve more charitable interpretation given the dangerous circumstances of their exile. This article engages Reformed principles of biblical interpretation while addressing questions of Christian ethics in difficult circumstances.
Having read Rev. Richard Smit's article on Queen Esther [see December 1, 2013, p. 116], I would like to raise a few questions and comments. At the outset I wish to make it quite clear I am in overall agreement with his response to Prof. Lee Beach's article. I quite agree that deliberately to deceive and lie can never promote the truth of the gospel. I do however think Queen Esther and her uncle Mordecai come under an undue and severe criticism. I will make the following comments and...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org