Ideas Have Consequences: The Cult of Charles Darwin (5)
Kalsbeek critiques theistic evolution as a false compromise between Darwinian evolutionary theory and biblical creation doctrine, arguing that such harmonization undermines Scripture's clear testimony about how God created. The article challenges the claim that the Bible is silent on creation's mechanism and contends that accepting theistic evolution within the church has serious spiritual consequences for believers seeking to maintain biblical fidelity.
Previous article in this series: April 15, 2012, p. 319. "And the children of Issachar, which were men that had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do: the heads of them were two hundred; and all their brethren were at their commandment." I Chronicles 12:32 In our previous article the case was made that modern science's adoption and strict adherence to Darwin's doctrine of evolution has resulted in serious detrimental consequences for the study and development of science....
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer