Islamophobia: How Offensive is “Grossly” Offensive? / Planned Parenthood “Sting Operation” Boomerangs
This article examines a 2016 Northern Ireland court case involving Pastor James McConnell's sermon critical of Islam, analyzing the legal distinction between offensive and criminally "grossly offensive" speech. McGeown discusses the judgment's reasoning regarding free speech protections and the application of the Communications Act 2003, offering a Reformed Christian perspective on religious liberty and the limits of state censorship of religious expression.
Islamophobia: How Offensive is "Grossly" Offensive? On January 5, 2016, District Judge McNally of Belfast Crown Court, Northern Ireland, delivered his judgment on the now famous (or infamous) Islamophobia case. In a victory for free speech and freedom of religion, Pastor James McConnell who, in a sermon on May 18, 2014 preached that "Islam is heathen, Islam is Satanic, Islam is a doctrine spawned in hell," was acquitted of the charge of "sending or causing to be sent by means of a public...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org
Related Resources
The Gospel And AI: Why God Will Never be Pleased With an AI-Generated Sermon (Nor with the Minister Who Tries)
Barry Gritters
Standard BearerFor it Seemed Good to the Spirit and to Us*
William Langerak
Standard BearerEditor’s Notes
Unknown
Standard BearerSynod 2025 Summary
Joshua Engelsma
Standard BearerThe Minister’s Relation to Christ’s Body*
Douglas Kuiper
Standard Bearer