The Synod of Dordt, Arminianism, and Pierre du Moulin
This article examines Pierre du Moulin's influential role in opposing Arminianism during the early 1600s, despite his absence from the Synod of Dort itself. While du Moulin effectively defended Reformed doctrine against Arminian errors, the article also identifies certain theological weaknesses in his positions on reprobation, irresistible grace, and the extent of the atonement. The resource provides valuable historical context for understanding the Calvinist-Arminian controversy and the development of Reformed orthodoxy at Dordt.
When the leading theologians at the Synod of Dordt are spoken of, Pierre Du Moulin's name is not mentioned. While Du Moulin was not allowed to attend the Synod, God did use him to promote the Canons and to preserve the truth that has been passed to us. In the early 1600s, the Calvinist-Arminian controversy spread throughout Europe. The controversy was over predestination and related topics, such as free will and the extent of Christ's atonement. The debate began in the Netherlands as a result...
Full article available on sb.rfpa.org